Iceymom2be
Virtuoso
Registered: 02/18/08
Posts: 1,567
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #1 |
This is a long read but well worth it I think...If you would rather watch than read... http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01232009/watch2.html
Excerpt of the transcript from The Bill Moyers Show on PBS
Quote: PATRICIA WILLIAMS: Well, I think that he is, on the one hand, our first African American president. And some people call him our first bi-racial president. BILL MOYERS: Right. PATRICIA WILLIAMS: Some people say that he is, or really consider him still much more acceptable because he has a white parent. I think that part of that internecine warfare within the black community based on skin color. I think one of the freighted problems within the black community with hearing words like "bi-racial" is that, you know, African Americans have always been multi-racial. We are, I mean, you know, since slavery, at least bi-racial. And so that some of that vocabulary within the black community I think evokes images of half-breed, quadroon, mulatto, the kind of color coded, tragic mulatto conversation that induces a kind of hierarchy. And I think that that's going to be part of a new American vocabulary in dealing with that unconscious level of distinction. BILL MOYERS: What do you think about that? MELISSA HARRIS-LACEWELL: Well, so for me I suppose the notion of Barack Obama as our first bi-racial president is troubling. And it's troubling in part because, as you point out, African Americans have always been a multi-racial people, or at least for all of contemporary American history they have been a multi-racial people. But the other thing is that race is not simply about biology. Race is, of course, socially and legally constructed. And at every point in American history Barack Obama would have been in the category of black. He would have been enslaveable under the slave codes. He would have been Jim Crowed in the context of the Jim Crow South. Homer Plessy, who is the litigate in the Plessy v. Ferguson, which establishes separate but equal, the legal code that we think of the civil rights movement as finally breaking open, was so visibly or physiologically white that he had to go to the conductor on the train and tell him, "I'm passing the color line here. I'm breaking the color line. You need to arrest me." So all of the moments of American racial political history hinge right around a space where multi-racial, sometimes much more sort of in appearance white-black people, have been a part of the story. So it's very hard for me to imagine that now, at the culmination of one part of the black political story, we would start to break that off and assign it to a group that simply does not exist as a matter of law, the bi-racial group. I suppose what I find exciting about the upfrontness about Barack Obama's patchwork, racial identity is that it allows him to be empowering to many different kinds of people. But at the same time, to take away that this is a particular moment of ordinary black folks on the ground who came to D.C. in numbers like nothing I've ever seen, who stood there in the cold. That is the accomplishment and the achievement of ordinary black folks on the ground as voters, as those who survived the Jim Crow South. So I just can't take Barack away from us. We need him. BILL MOYERS: Does this change life for those ordinary black Americans, this election? PATRICIA WILLIAMS: I think it changes the self-perception of African Americans. Obviously nothing is going to change life overnight. But I think that it is too easy to dismiss the symbolism of this particular election. It's too easy to dismiss the sense of investment of identity. I hear over and over again people, not just African Americans but particularly African Americans, who felt so disenfranchised for so long, feeling so deeply, deeply American. People saying that they picked up a flag and waved it for the first time in their lives and waved it with such enthusiasm. And not in a sense that this is just an African American administration but that they feel united to all Americans, that he represents all Americans. And in that, the constituency of African Americans feel connected to other constituencies from whom they felt quite segregated and dispossessed. BILL MOYERS: Obama himself once said he was trying to raise himself as a black man in America and, quote, "Beyond the given of my appearance, no one around seemed to know exactly what that meant." Have you given any thought as to why he chose to be African American instead than bi-racial? PATRICIA WILLIAMS: The word "choice" is probably a little bit overstated because I don't think that anyone really chooses when you are apparently BILL MOYERS: Right. PATRICIA WILLIAMS: -dark skinned. And at the same time, I do think that the question of African American manhood is a very freighted cultural identity. And I don't think it's just somebody with his background that struggles with that. I have a 16-year-old son who was struggling to understand what growing up as an African American man means. I wouldn't separate it from the general struggle of what it means to be, to appear to the world, in a particular way that, to which people assign, you know, extra cool or a particular way of dressing or a particular way of speaking. And I think it's quite complicated for anybody. MELISSA HARRIS-LACEWELL: Well, there seems to be some evidence in the first autobiography, "Dreams from My Father", where he suggests that part of that choice has to do with angling towards being his dad, that that absent parent gave him something to which he was trying to aspire, that he'd heard lots of stories about what an enormous personality and an important man his father was. So I think part of the choice of blackness had to do with him trying to come into being like Barack, Sr. But the real symbol that we see every moment is his choice of Michelle Obama. And in many ways, Michelle Robinson, who becomes Michelle Obama, is representative of a very particular choice on the part of Barack, that as a multi-racial, Harvard Law educated, African American man, those of us in the black community get what the choices for dating and marriage were for Barack. And he chose a woman as tall as him, as smart as him, and black from a distance. She's a woman who is not someone who could have ever opted out of blackness. And here he is rearing two African American daughters, on the South Side of Chicago, with a smart, tall, fabulous black wife. And it, you know, it helps me forgive a lot of policy ills for Barack when I see Michelle, only in the sense that there is for me a sense, at a core level —that he sees me, that he sees my daughter, who's seven years old, that whatever our disagreements are, there is a fundamental goodwill around his sense of the humanity of African American women. And that is, I think, a very empowering connection back with African American voters. __________________ "Who is going to check ME Boo??" ~Sheree of RHOA
 |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #2 |
Quote: PATRICIA WILLIAMS: Some people say that he is, or really consider him still much more acceptable because he has a white parent. I think that part of that internecine warfare within the black community based on skin color. I think one of the freighted problems within the black community with hearing words like "bi-racial" is that, you know, African Americans have always been multi-racial. We are, I mean, you know, since slavery, at least bi-racial. And so that some of that vocabulary within the black community I think evokes images of half-breed, quadroon, mulatto, the kind of color coded, tragic mulatto conversation that induces a kind of hierarchy. And I think that that's going to be part of a new American vocabulary in dealing with that unconscious level of distinction. The Problem with Professor William's assesment is that she ignores a few key facts. Indeed, African Americans are predominantly of dual ancestry. But African Americans are still predominantly of African descent, and predominantly monocultural. "Bi-racial" or more accurately First generationally mixed people, usually have 50% or more European ancestry (The African American average is 10.6%) and also are exposed to two different cultures and two sets of disparate looking family members. Furthermore, they tend to not look exactly like either side of the family. Places like the Dominican Republic or Cape Verde are much more mixed than the African American population and yet this still holds true. They can look at both their parents and see themselves. Obama has chosen to identify as Black. A lot has to do with Jim Crow mentalities and what his mother raised him to identify as. But it does not change that Obama was exposed to a culture and a kinship group most African Americans have never been exposed to. Nor have most African Americans had to look at both their parents and not see themselves truly reflected. 
Quote: MELISSA HARRIS-LACEWELL: Well, so for me I suppose the notion of Barack Obama as our first bi-racial president is troubling. And it's troubling in part because, as you point out, African Americans have always been a multi-racial people, or at least for all of contemporary American history they have been a multi-racial people. But the other thing is that race is not simply about biology. Race is, of course, socially and legally constructed. And at every point in American history Barack Obama would have been in the category of black. He would have been enslaveable under the slave codes. He would have been Jim Crowed in the context of the Jim Crow South. The problem with Professor Harris-Lacewell's assesment is that she is incorrect about American history and racial categorizations. Under the slave codes, matrilinealism was the rule of the day. Not race. Obama's mother was a free woman so he would have been born free. And for that matter, his father was free as well, so he would have been like a free person of color back in the day. Nor would he have been Black in every point of American history as claimed. In fact, most states had blood quantum rules and those rules fluctuated by region and time period. Some places had two tiered systems and some places had three tiered systems. In Ohio, there was a time period where he would have been considered White . And in fact, to this day, there are many populations in the outskirts that would probably still see him as other than Black if he was a part of their community. Like the Jackson Whites in the Ramapo mountains where people could easily look like this:  Or the Lumbees which identify with their indigenous side more and have many members that look like this:  Quote: PATRICIA WILLIAMS: The word "choice" is probably a little bit overstated because I don't think that anyone really chooses when you are apparently dark skinned. And at the same time, I do think that the question of African American manhood is a very freighted cultural identity. Yes, Jim Crow, has weighed mixed people's identities more toward Black in the US, but there is still a lot of choice involved in those identities. For example, Obama's half brother who was born to another White woman does not identify as Black. Genetically, both are identical, but life experiences lead them through different life paths and choices. I do agree with Professor Harris-Lacewell here:
Quote: MELISSA HARRIS-LACEWELL: Well, there seems to be some evidence in the first autobiography, "Dreams from My Father", where he suggests that part of that choice has to do with angling towards being his dad, that that absent parent gave him something to which he was trying to aspire, that he'd heard lots of stories about what an enormous personality and an important man his father was. So I think part of the choice of blackness had to do with him trying to come into being like Barack, Sr. But the real symbol that we see every moment is his choice of Michelle Obama. And in many ways, Michelle Robinson, who becomes Michelle Obama, is representative of a very particular choice on the part of Barack, that as a multi-racial, Harvard Law educated, African American man, those of us in the black community get what the choices for dating and marriage were for Barack. And he chose a woman as tall as him, as smart as him, and black from a distance. She's a woman who is not someone who could have ever opted out of blackness. And here he is rearing two African American daughters, on the South Side of Chicago, with a smart, tall, fabulous black wife. And it, you know, it helps me forgive a lot of policy ills for Barack when I see Michelle, only in the sense that there is for me a sense, at a core level —that he sees me, that he sees my daughter, who's seven years old, that whatever our disagreements are, there is a fundamental goodwill around his sense of the humanity of African American women. And that is, I think, a very empowering connection back with African American voters. |
| | Dave Aficionado
Registered: 12/21/06
Posts: 701
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #3 |
1. There's nothing troubling about President Obama being considered America's first white/black biracial president. 2. As usual, I think the tactic to compare white/black biracials to black-identified folks is used to take white/black biracials down a peg. 3. Notice that Patricia Williams is not telling Bill Moyers, the host, that she think it's okay for him, Bill Moyers to be identified as white, but that it's "problematic" for President Obama to be identified as "white/black biracial". 4. There are about 70 million white-identified people with recent traceable black/sub-saharan african ancestry. Until Patricia Williams starts finding it problematic that they're called "white" instead of "black", I think it's selective to go after those who describe President Obama as white/black biracial.
I think this is part of a traditional tactic to supress and controversialize positive white/black biracial identity. If you've ever wondered why positive multiracial identity has been less prevalent in the USA than in other parts of the world, why there has been less recognition of multiracials on censuses, application forms, and cultural narratives, I think it's the hard work of folks like Patricia Williams and Bill Moyers. I think that for white folks who are uncomfortable with racial mixing, and who are uncomfortable with white/black biracials having access to whiteness, Patricia Williams offers them a politically correct way to promote narratives that downplay racial mixing between whites and blacks.
Next time you wonder why there isn't more positive white/black biracial identity in the USA and the world, I encourage you to think about Patricia Williams and the narratives that she innovates and promotes. Also Bill Moyers and the guests he chooses to have (or not have) on his talk show. Melissa Harris-Lacewell also seems to be promoting the same narrative, but I'll refrain from commenting further, as this is the first I've heard of her.
p.s. Of course, we have the power to communicate with her to express our disagreement, for those who disagree with her.
I'll try to find and post her public email here. Anyone else who gets to it first is also welcome to. EDIT:
Here's her blog:
http://madlawprofessor.wordpress.com
And here's a post where she writes "Everybody's a mutt." From the Bill Moyers transcript and this blog post, I think Professor Williams is a bit agressively inclined against distinct advocacy for white/black biracials. She's promoted the two common versions of the argument against white/black biracial identity: (1) You should feel guilty about identifying as white/black biracial instead of solely as black (2) Everybody's mixed, there's nothing distinct about your experience.
Thus, when Obama called himself a "mutt", her go to response in this post seemed to me to be "Everybody's a mutt, there's nothing distinct or unique about his experience".
And now, the follow up in the interview: guilt tripping anyone in the media who would call Obama "white/black biracial".
http://madlawprofessor.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/mutts-like-me/
__________________ How you can support the existence of mulatto.org (one member's suggestions):
1. Donate funds to cover expenses at http://www.mulatto.org
2. Put the donation link in your signature and encourage others to donate.
3. Promote mulatto.org. Blog about it, post links in other message boards or comment sections, tell others about it offline, design and/or post flyers and stickers promoting mulatto.org offline.
4. Financially support businesses that link to mulatto.org. |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #4 |
Quote: Originally Posted by Dave 4. There are about 70 million white-identified people with recent traceable black/sub-saharan african ancestry. Until Patricia Williams starts finding it problematic that they're called "white" instead of "black", I think it's selective to go after those who describe President Obama as white/black biracial. While I agree with most of your post, this is slightly intellectually dishonest by omission. Most White Americans with African ancestry are not like most Black Americans with European ancestry. The mean percentage per person is like 3 to 5% while in African Americans it is much higher with studies indicating from 10.6 to 20% average admixture. |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #5 |
 Patricia Williams is another case of Light Skinned Black Militant syndrome. |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #6 | Actually, both of them are basically as light as Bill Moyers. No wonder they feel threatened.

|
| | mulan Moderator
Registered: 12/24/06
Posts: 1,501
| | swirlgirl Dilettante
Registered: 12/24/08
Posts: 198
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #8 |
For being a lawyer, Patricia Williams ain't that informed. For one thing, Beyonce and Jennifer Lopez don't look alike, and Beyonce wouldn't be readily identified as Latina. Secondly, Kimora Lee Simmons doesn't have a black phenotype, and as far as I can tell, has never publicly identified herself as strictly black, and for the umpteenth time, Tiger Woods DOESN'T IDENTIFY AS BLACK!!!! Claiming he does don't make it so!! Additionally, Ms. Williams has no business talking about Native American law, because it's quite obvious that she doesn't know jack about tribal membership criteria. It differs from tribe to tribe and is based both on blood quantum, and whether the tribal member is registered on paper, including rolls from back when Indians were being put on reservations. Lastly, Patricia Williams is obviously misinformed about how the ODR worked back in the day. Although mulattos could be enslaved, it was, as pointed out in a previous post, based on whether the mother was free, thus Obama wouldv'e been free. Even if Obama had been enslaved, his racial categorization would've been on a tiered system, with mulatto, quadroon, octaroon, etc, being sub categories of black, so technically speaking, he wouldn't be black. Oh,and Ms. Williams can kiss my mulatto a**, dismissing my heritage in such a way. No, Ms. Williams, mulatto ain't a separate category on most forms , but it is a different experience. It's a mulatto thing, you wouldn't understand! Man, this post is chock full of ignorance and hatred. Arrrghhh!! I'm gonna go off and pray for patience and understanding, after all, that's what our new President would want for us. __________________ I'm not black enough to like Luther Vandross, not white enough to like Celine Dion- my friend on his musical preferences |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #9 |
Quote: Originally Posted by swirlgirlFor being a lawyer, Patricia Williams ain't that informed. For one thing, Beyonce and Jennifer Lopez don't look alike, and Beyonce wouldn't be readily identified as Latina. Secondly, Kimora Lee Simmons doesn't have a black phenotype, and as far as I can tell, has never publicly identified herself as strictly black, and for the umpteenth time, Tiger Woods DOESN'T IDENTIFY AS BLACK!!!! Claiming he does don't make it so!! Additionally, Ms. Williams has no business talking about Native American law, because it's quite obvious that she doesn't know jack about tribal membership criteria. It differs from tribe to tribe and is based both on blood quantum, and whether the tribal member is registered on paper, including rolls from back when Indians were being put on reservations. Lastly, Patricia Williams is obviously misinformed about how the ODR worked back in the day. Although mulattos could be enslaved, it was, as pointed out in a previous post, based on whether the mother was free, thus Obama wouldv'e been free. Even if Obama had been enslaved, his racial categorization would've been on a tiered system, with mulatto, quadroon, octaroon, etc, being sub categories of black, so technically speaking, he wouldn't be black. Oh,and Ms. Williams can kiss my mulatto a**, dismissing my heritage in such a way. No, Ms. Williams, mulatto ain't a separate category on most forms , but it is a different experience. It's a mulatto thing, you wouldn't understand! Man, this post is chock full of ignorance and hatred. Arrrghhh!! I'm gonna go off and pray for patience and understanding, after all, that's what our new President would want for us. And she is a law professor at Columbia, no less. I forwarded them both my comments, and I forwarded Professor Williams your comment as well. Let's see if we get an intelligent response. |
| | blackice
Virtuoso
Registered: 01/22/08
Posts: 1,302
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #10 |
Quote: nt is that she ignores a few key facts. Indeed, African Americans are predominantly of dual ancestry. But African Americans are still predominantly of African descent, and predominantly monocultural. "Bi-racial" or more accurately First generationally mixed people, usually have 50% or more African ancestry and also are exposed to two different cultures and two sets of disparate looking family members.
See this is my issue, and this is the reason why I have a problem with the "Obama is black because were all mixed" theory. Yes in my opinion Obama looks like a light skinned black man BUT the fact that he has a white mother changes the whole dynamic. Your up bringing has to be different and you have to have different experiences when you are mulatto. I think a lot of people like to convieniently overlook this fact because its a hard one to tackle if you are trying to argue that Obama is "Black"
|
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #11 | Obama is not and never was a "biracial president". Mainly because of his own choice. He chose one of the sides and decided it would be more profitable for him if he was only "black".
That's why it is kind of sad to see the people of this site having illusions about acceptance or change in how racism (or racialism) works in the US. Obama doesn't change anything, and, as a matter of fact, he reinforces what is already there.
You will always be an appendage of the black movement, never yourselves. You will be there to be used and serve as example to others. You are the living testimony of the ODR. |
| | Rutita
Virtuoso
Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 2,812
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #12 |
Quote: Originally Posted by anticomuna
You will always be an appendage of the black movement, never yourselves. You will be there to be used and serve as example to others. You are the living testimony of the ODR.
Did you look in your crystal ball and see all that? __________________ Perfectly flawed, and more... |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #13 |
Quote: Originally Posted by anticomuna Obama is not and never was a "biracial president". Mainly because of his own choice. He chose one of the sides and decided it would be more profitable for him if he was only "black".
That's why it is kind of sad to see the people of this site having illusions about acceptance or change in how racism (or racialism) works in the US. Obama doesn't change anything, and, as a matter of fact, he reinforces what is already there.
You will always be an appendage of the black movement, never yourselves. You will be there to be used and serve as example to others. You are the living testimony of the ODR.
You are deluded and as usual speak only for yourself. |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #14 |
Why do you content yourselves with so little? Why so little? Is it good enough that a few mongrels who understand what the ODR is about actually think Obama is biracial? When for the vast majority he is black?
Are you that weak?
Mongrels who want to be niggers. The only way for you is the example Obama has given, you need to pass as niggers. If you pretend you like it, then blacks might even help you... hahaha.
How sad. |
| | Registered: Member deleted
Posts: N/A
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #15 |
Quote: Originally Posted by anticomunaWhy do you content yourselves with so little? Why so little? Is it good enough that a few mongrels who understand what the ODR is about actually think Obama is biracial? When for the vast majority he is black?
Are you that weak?
Mongrels who want to be niggers. The only way for you is the example Obama has given, you need to pass as niggers. If you pretend you like it, then blacks might even help you... hahaha.
How sad. What is sad is an inbred loser like you claiming to be Brazilian and posting on a site for mixed people because you are frustrated about your own position in life. LOL |
| |
|